Home     Contact Us    
Main Board Job Seeker's Board Job Wanted Board Resume Bank Company Board Word Help Medquist New MTs Classifieds Offshore Concerns VR/Speech Recognition Tech Help Coding/Medical Billing
Gab Board Politics Comedy Stop Health Issues
ADVERTISEMENT




Serving Over 20,000 US Medical Transcriptionists

Payback is what comes after notification that your sup is being unfair.

Posted By: Sounds good but... on 2008-11-26
In Reply to: You should report that team leader to M.L. - sm

I have lost 1/3 of my income, lost ability to work OT and am having less than desirable work siphoned to me since I finally found the courage to go above my sup's head. So, know the risk if you stay in the job.


Complete Discussion Below: marks the location of current message within thread

The messages you are viewing are archived/old.
To view latest messages and participate in discussions, select the boards given in left menu


Other related messages found in our database

Two months after notification
Do you not have the option of leaving? You might consider getting another offer - but before accepting use it as a negotiating tool to get them to fix the problem and offer a settlement for back pay. (Unless of course, they are overstaffed - then it won't work). You be the judge.
NN is right -- notification is in the e/mail; i just checked.
X
Another example of how unfair they are.

It is definitely unfair if someone has been
there for 8 or 9 months, has to wait until 12 months before even accruing 1 minute of PTO and a new employee hired today gets PTO immediately.  How is that not unfair?
How is it unfair?
Constantly assuring someone their check has been mailed and still has not been recieved is not good business ethics period. Then to have the threats on top of it...that is just plain bs. She STILL has not gotten her check and if he has any decency he will stop payment on this supposedly mailed check and just overnight her a cashier's check for her full pay. I dont know about anyone else, but Im not rich and need my checks in a timely manner, and as far as I know there arent MTs out there just doing this for the fun of it alone. Not being paid is what is UNfair.
It is unfair because those of us

who have put in 10, 20, 30 years or more should not make what a newbie does period!  It doesn't matter if it's production or not.  Someone with 10 years or more experience should NEVER make what someone just coming out of school or with 1, 2, 3 years in MT.  We have put in our time, learned a lot in those years, and absolutely should be rewarded with higher line rates for that!   When the newbies get in their years and years of experience, they too should be rewarded. 


It used to be we all had to start small and work our way up.  Now it seems that everyone makes the same, and it's not right at all! 


SPi unfair!

The new comp plan looks wonderful but when you start typing you notice it takes almost double to get your line counts.  Sure, they lowered their line counts, but they don't pay for headers, footers, spaces, returns, tabs, and the patient info area!  We get audits and have never been provided with the policy on them. 


So much is changing in that company!  Something is wrong!  Everytime you turn around there are new MQ managers and less United States MTs and Editors.  What is going on?  I've went though 5 managers in the past 6 months!  The director of ops is running though the company trying to model it after MQ.  Well look where MQ is now!  Why don't people see that the higher-ups are NOT getting the job done correctly and everything is falling apart!  A change has to happen or this company is going down faster than Leroy Brown.  They need to start changing their upper OP managment team ~starting with the director and all of her MQ followers!


unfair practices
I would like people to be aware of a company called Advantec MT, to let people know that at least at the beginning they pay 1/2 cent per line but don't let you know until your first paycheck is due and then you find out and you have to pay for their equipemnt which I believe is very deceptive.  Thought everyone should know.
not really unfair, a lot of other companies do that too
At my last office position I had to wait a year for vacation.
That seems unfair. I have no reason to think sm

they do anything unfair.  I did a little over 3000 lines last Sunday.  If they were manipulating things in any way, that wouldn't seem likely. 


Granted, I would like to be able to use the Ctrl/I function, but because I cannot, I do not automatically assume something underhanded is going on.  The company has treated me well, and I have no reason to suspect they would cheat me in any way, and it is unfair for you to imply they do unless you have proof to back it up.


100% QASeems VERY unfair for..sm
Unfair to QA the whole group for work THAT'S UNPAID to begin with, such as demographics garbage, etc. bookkeeping that their OWN clerical staff is supposed to be doing...not the  MT for GRATIS...If the client really is so demandinging and picky about the demographic work, you know full well that he is paying the MTSO for it, while we get to do it for nothing for the sheer privilege of working for them.  What the heck does this have to do with transcription?? That's what we were hired for and paid for....let them do their own bookkeeping.
Don't you feel this is the least bit unfair? sm
Unfair to each one of these companies who has to spend quite a large sum of money to recruit and train and ship your equipment? And unfair to yourself, as how can you expect to truly learn all the different operating systems and dictators and accounts if you can't concentrate on just learning a single thing at one time?

I think you give us all a bad name.
You're right - it is unfair

My company actually put it in the employee manual - that employees are required to use PTO for periods of low work volume and computer downtime - and the company reserves the right to INSIST upon the use of PTO.  Obviously if a company needs to put that language in their manual, they are deliberately planning to overhire, run out of work, and have computer downtime.  It is completely unfair - especially since there are rules about requesting it in advance when we want to use it for OUR reasons, but of course those rules are waived when forced to use it for the company's advantage!


Companies SHOULD live up to their end of employment and pay when you show up to work as agreed - and most do in other industries!  What is the point in EARNING something they can snatch away whenever they please?  PTO is not really a benefit when you are forced to use at the company's whim and for their benefit instead of your own.  This ensures you never get to plan an actual vacation, and the company doesn't have to have much concern when work volumes are low - they can just force us all to go on vacation - although instead of CALLING it that and letting us WALK AWAY from the job and go do something else - they force us to sit there and TRY to work, then take the vacation after the fact when it turns out there was none!  That is a double whammy because you never got to actually LEAVE the workstation - and it snatches away a future time when you actually planned to!  So of course we get burnt out and miserable without hope of a REAL vacation spent away from the keyboard!


It stinks that every chance they get, some suit (who gets salary and NEVER gets forced to take PTO himself) finds a way to steal an employee's benefit and turn it into a benefit for the company instead.  PTO under these circumstances is NOT a benefit - it is just another term for slave labor.  How DARE they act like unpaid time off is a priveledge that THEY may choose for us, but WE may not.  Its unbelievable the lack of respect we receive, and the crap we are supposed to put up with, for the luxury of working at home.


That's pretty unfair.
Just because the patient returns for multiple hem/onc visits is not a good enough reason to pay lower scale to type a few lines.  
Unfair and no work
I have worked for them for about a year now and they are always running out of work.  They are sweet as pie to you if they need you to help with overflow, but when work runs out they get ugly.  JMO
It's unfair to say it's only people with children.
I think the above poster is correct that it's the perception that you can work when you want to that has caused this, not just people who have kids. I have a transcription service and some of the worst offenders don't have any children at all. Even in the real world I always saved my vacation days, etc. to use for my children's school events or whatever and took time off for my kids because they are my no. 1 priority. That has never interfered with my fulfillment of my job duties, even when I worked outside of the home.

I've hired anywhere from someone straight out of school to older people nearing retirement age and some of my best ICs were mothers. Some of my worst included one gal who wanted to party every night of the week and couldn't work the next day with a hangover, an older lady who got tired earlier in the day than she thought she would so she had to stop work early, and yet another lady who had marital problems and used an argument with her hubby as her excuse not to work on any given day. I can give more examples, none of which involve kids. Most of the women with kids did well because they knew how to organize their time, worked when kids were asleep or at school since they knew it was their only chance to get it done, and they were adept at multitasking.

What you are really seeing is a lack of work ethic in general, in all different professions. So many want to get rich right now but they don't want to have to work to do so. We live in a drive-thru, high-speed society and everyone wants everything RIGHT NOW with the least amount of effort possible.
as unfair as it sounds, I have never heard sm
of a company that lets you see a contract until you are ready to sign. If when you read it you don't like it, you don't have to sign it. A hassle yes, but companies are not going to just arbitrarily send out their contracts for folks to see.
I think you are being a bit unfair. We all say we want MTSOs to be upfront sm

about what they will pay, what they expect, and not to waste OUR time testing if the wages or whatever do not meet our expectations, then when someone does that, she gets blasted.  I just started doing some part-time work for her, and the work is clinic work, which is super easy, and the pay is on time and it is weekly, which is a nice little extra. 


Just my thoughts


That is crazy!! I do QA too - how unfair to be docked points!
//
As I have stated repeatedly, although very unfair, leads have line counts too.
nm
Curious. Scrolling down yesterday and noted comment about unfair labor practice
suit possibly brought by an MT against a certain company.  I know this company only hires ICs - not employees.  Is this possible?  TIA.