Or it could be that "your company" couldn't quite make the cut.

• Don't believe all you read.... - I'm so glad (sm)
  • Believe it - LV1
  • You need to make sure you read these - Excuse me but
  • Well, believe THIS! - And guess who wrote it?
    • That would be from shifty Andy. That came after - Remember it well
    • Where can this statement be found? - nm
      • From the company owner to the employees - in a company email.....
  • I agree with poster below who said it works - sm
  • Or maybe some people have nothing to compare to, so they - nice theory, but NOT true
    • Go ahead and warn 'em - wasn't saying you shouldn't
      • I've always agreed with that. - me again
  • Poof... - and they disappear...nm
    • Someone's got you all riled up - guess they hit a sore spot
  • Golly, you aren't kidding! - Confused MT
  • Or it could be that "your company" couldn't quite make the cut. - works both ways!

The messages you are viewing are archived/old.
To view latest messages and participate in discussions, select the boards given in left menu

but was anal retentive when it came to punctuation.  You would have a report with 10 blanks in it because of poor sound quality, and he wouldn't fill in one blank, but he had put commas all throughout your report, or taken apostrophes out, etc. and he wasn't correct in his punctuation a lot of the time.   Several of the MTs complained about him and asked to not have him do their QA, so he was demoted from QA to an MT.  Well, as I said earlier, he couldn't fill in a blank.  I saw a couple of his reports and there was blank after blank in reports that I had no trouble with at all.  He also didn't proof his reports because he would have inapproriate/incorrect expansions in them.  Not sure if he left on his own, or didn't really have a choice.  Anyway, talk to your supervisor.  Maybe this person is just on a power trip, knows you are new and wants to train you to do it her way, even if your way isn't incorrect.  I think punctuation is a valid issue, but if it doesn't change the integrity of the report and there are no other errors it shouldn't be flagged by QA.    You could also take into account her corrections and maybe try to use a few more commas, etc. and that might help.  

By that I mean, how much lag time between sending one report and getting another, how much demographic stuff, searching for place names, doctor names and cc's, consulting of account-specific instructions, all things that do not pay, are you required to do?

Right now, the company I work for makes demographics and cc's easy.  OTOH, each account is very different from another in format and style, so that takes a lot of time. 

Once upon a time, I worked for a company in which I estimated all the 'fiddly' work took about 10 seconds per report (large hospitals), which I thought was pretty good.  Not like that anymore.

Thanks for any insight and input on this.

I worked for MQ for 6 years,  and they went from bad to worse. I am glad I do not work there anymore. I worked every weekend (my choice) and almost every holiday for them. They do not give you any differential for working w/e or holidays and will try to screw you out of any $$ they possibly can.  After 6 years, no one even said thank you, good luck..nothing!!!  I now work for a company that actually appreciates my work!