Oops. Meant to say grammar police.

• Low work and overhiring again. - ICMT
  • honey, this could be any given company out there. NM - anon
  • I'm thinking I work there, - experiencing the same.
  • I'm thinking I work for the same company.... - not sure
    • Never heard of queue shutoff, but...sm - TX MT
      • I am having the same experience. and - there is a lot of hot air/wind
      • As I have stated repeatedly, although very unfair, leads have line counts too. - moving on
        • IT THIS CAN BE MORE OR LESS PROVED...SM - TX MT
          • How can they allow this?? I'm furious! - brokeMT
        • Every day I think about getting a new position but - afraid of jumping into same or worse situation.
    • I am guessing that the OP meant the queue - anotherMT
      • The latter case, likely. It's also...sm - TX MT
        • Could just be a perk of being a lead, the better dictation. They can. - moving on
        • You know, I have had that happen several times lately! - Me too!
      • Ok. Just wondered. - not sure
        • You are not alone! Well, at least - we are in this together and
          • True! - not sure
            • Or maybe we'll get an e mail saying - there's 100 minutes and 1 MT
              • yup.. - not sure
  • I was thinking the exact same thing. - And it's a well respected company too.
    • Can you give me a hint as to which company? The same thing happens to me too and I am an IC. nm - hint
      • Not 100% sure but I am guessing a company in - Maryland. nm
        • I don't want to be paranoid, but that would be - MDMT
      • It's happening where I work too.. - MT2
        • But that's not IC is it? The company suggesting a time I mean. - EmployeeorIC
          • It's the overhiring for TAT. - Simply put.nm

The messages you are viewing are archived/old.
To view latest messages and participate in discussions, select the boards given in left menu

Many MTs come to this site to relax and may not have the time or desire to proofread their messages.

Moderator

Having nothing meaningful to contribute, these immature holier-than-thou self-proclaimied experts need to vent their insecurities by finding fault with something as insignificant as spelling/grammar.  Reminds me a lot of a large percentage of QAs -- need to nitpick on something trivial, real or imagined.

I would just tell them to kiss my butt, unless they are also paying my salary - otherwise they should MTOB.

Having nothing meaningful to contribute, these immature holier-than-thou self-proclaimied experts need to vent their insecurities by finding fault with something as insignificant as spelling/grammar.  Reminds me a lot of a large percentage of QAs -- need to nitpick on something trivial, real or imagined.

I would just tell them to kiss my butt, unless they are also paying my salary - otherwise they should MTOB.

That really irks me that a company thinks they can run someone's credit without authorization - business like them need to pay through the pocketbook - maybe they will learn a lesson.

I don't mind undergoing credit check if I'm told in advance and I authorize it - but I would DEFINITELY go after a company for the maximum penalties allowed  if it ran one without my consent.