My what a vocabulary you have!

• Wouldn't it be interesting if MTSOs - had a board they could come to
  • MT VERSUS MTSO - Auntdee
    • I'd hire you in a NY minute. nm - MTSO
  • They have our resumes, see our work during testing and - and check our references DUH!!!
    • Time to jump in here. Some MTs test well, interview well, only put references on there - MTSO
      • Just to clarify, I wrote the first few MTSO posts - First "MTSO"
      • While I do not debate that this does happen. sm - Okay
        • Amen!!!!! - Brother Ben
  • Are u crazy? - It is not a matter of loyalty
    • Not so sure many MTs are not hanging themselves - - no name, no state
      • My big beef (sm) - fuzz5
        • Yes, experience does not always equal quality work! - busytyping
        • What makes me mad? sm - wmx
          • If you're referring to me...(sm) - fuzz5
            • So do I. nm - wmx
              • Er, maybe I was being paranoid, sorry (mm) - fuzz5
  • Well for one thing, it would not be a professional thing - My opinion
    • Being a job hopper does not make you look like..sm - MTSO
      • Being able to do anything thrown at you - Milton's Red Stapler
        • job hopper - ILMT
        • It's like they cheated the work out of you (sm) - fuzz5
          • TOO much information, fuzz. I suggest you read sm - Webmedxer
            • Huh? Moderator, what's your opinion? (sm) - fuzz5
              • No, I was referring to the Webmedx Policy Manual. sm - Webmedexer
              • I think she is referring to company policies not the policies on this board. sm - Just a friendly headsup.
        • Here, here, I agree. At one time, I was even accussed of holding MY templates hostage. Templates - I brought with me to the company. nm
      • Job hopping - We don't job hop on a whim
        • Also want to add, why should an MT stay at a co. that is always out of work. Sitting and waiting - doesn't pay the bills. nm
          • All MTSOs will be out of work at - one time or another.
            • Yes, there is such an animal. I work for a small co and have as much work as I want. Have - read similar posts about other companies. nm
          • Ummm...no. Obviously not. - MTSO
      • To: MTSO - what you may not know.
        • Oh, I fact check their resumes. And you are right.. - MTSO
          • I agree with you - I have 2 different MT jobs - on my resume in the last 2 years
        • a resume would still be more reliable - than anonymous words on a message board DUH!!!!!
          • My what a vocabulary you have! - !!!
    • You are taking my post a little too seriously - orig. poster
      • Yes, the point was missed. And we MTSOs DO ... - sm
      • You are being hypothetical while we are trying to find a co. where we can make a decent living,,,,nm - Go waste your time elsewhere.
        • You are also being hypothetical - ...
          • You have no idea what you are talking about. My income tax return says I am making a good living - at home. What is hypothetical about that? nm
      • show me the humor! Show me the humor! - Oh so that is what satire looks like!
        • What I was thinking! - Exactly
  • I do believe your loyalty is displaced. No MTSO or national are loyal to MTs - Loyal One
    • why speak of loyalty when as MTs - we are mostly treated shabbily
      • You are employed by the wrong company - Find one who will treat you right! (nm)
      • Re-read my post - that was my point! nm - Loyal One
  • No one job hops just for the heck of it. sm - Get real.
    • I worked for MQ for a very long time. sm - anon
      • I meant for this to show as a reply to the original poster! - Oops!
  • I can see your point but I stopped beig a - hall monitor in the 5th grade (SM)
    • Companies have to earn loyalty (sm) - fuzz5
      • You can also do a background check on companies - MTSO
        • So it is ok to attack a company once you leave as long as - another MTSO
        • sounds like a subliminal warning almost - but once a GOOD employee
  • If half of these companies were worth - jobhoppinmama
    • Where was that hop to? Your own accounts? - fuzz5
      • undercut national svces to get MT pvt accts......nm - probably own acct because one has to...
        • Undercutting ... yikes! - sm
          • I appreciate your post...perhaps I used....sm - probably own acct because one has to...
            • Okay, that's not really undercutting - sm
              • this is true and I don't want to lose a/c's..nm - probably own acct because one has to...
          • Blacklist you? - fuzz5
            • Not due to noncompete clause .. - sm
              • I love your posts - I'm learning from them...sm - probably own acct because one has to...
                • Gee, thanks for reminding me. - Taxes! Yuck!
                  • Thanks for your good wishes and....sm - probably own acct because one has to...
              • Ha! (sm) - fuzz5
                • That song is .. oh gosh, don't laugh - May be showing my age
    • Wow! Awesome hop! Congrats! nm - RadGuy

The messages you are viewing are archived/old.
To view latest messages and participate in discussions, select the boards given in left menu

Never really thought about it, but you are right.  They do have a limited vocabulary.  That's probably why their reports sound so funny, because they don't know the correct term to use and just use the closet term they can remember. 

Your post cracked me up.  Thanks again gourdpainter!