I thought the purpose of this site was

to be informative TO MTs and not AGAINST MTs.  If you are an MTSO who is getting bashed, well, don't you have the same right as the owner of this site to go out and form your own site/blog to bash anyone you want?  That's off topice anyway and wasn't what I meant when I posted.

People can say negative things about MTSOs (and the other way around) without it being bashing.  For example if someone asked about company X and I had worked for them 2 years and I'm in the process of leaving, I could perhaps say (as an example), I felt the initial account/platform training I received was inadequate and that kept me from meeting production minimum until my ? pay period.  That isn't bashing.  That's honest and if I say it was 2 years ago, the reader can inquire during the interview process about the company's current training procedures to see if it has improved during those 2 years. 

Wouldn't that hep both the MTSO and the potential MT be successful earlier in their relationship?

• Would you work for a company - diddles
  • Yes, I would if the pay is right and the offer was out of sight! nm - mt24
  • Absulutely not, but keep in mind... - sm
    • There is always that "secret network" - diddles
      • I wouldn't do it - NB
    • Very interesting. I am going to copy this and save it. nm - Thanks for the info
  • i wouldn't sign it, but cross that out and sign - yoga
  • most companies have that first part in their - company confidentiality policies anyway
    • but by not mentioning the name - diddles
      • i am one and have stated my reasons why - and was viciously attacked
        • That is why - sm
          • that is also a reason I might not apply to one - if there is nothing at all
      • Is it possible their MTs are too busy working why they - do not post?
        • no those employees are all over here - diddles
          • posts - curious
          • Nothing wrong with that but many recommend to their employer - see inside
          • one raw deal i see here is this - oh, forgot to add
            • I thought the purpose of this site was - diddles
              • well, that would be nice and fair IF we had - to log in but we don't
  • No (sm) - fuzz5

The messages you are viewing are archived/old.
To view latest messages and participate in discussions, select the boards given in left menu

Where did you discover them, they had an opening etc.  Go back to that and share your experience. May be able to locate them.

 I sure did hunt and peck where through a long list of MT companies listed on MTDaily.com to see if could find.  I know when you key in that company name on google.com your THING is posted there.

I simply don't understand why MTs post all these negative things about a company but will not divulge the name of the company or even give us a hint!  What are you afraid of?!?!!?  They are already screwing MTs over and probably you too if you're angry enough to post!  You can post anonymously, that's the beauty of this particular site.  No one need know who you are.

I, personally, keep a list of MTSOs and things I've heard about them.  God knows I've been through enough bad MTSOs, I want to save other MTs the heartache of going through the same crap I've gone through!

Besides the best way to get these MTSOs to change is to post their name on a PUBLIC forum.  Word of mouth can be a powerful thing!

Here is a list of companies I have worked for and the problems I have had, starting with the most recent:

JLG --> paid payroll practices, LATE pay checks, and discontinuation of direct deposit.

Focus Infomatics -->  they offshore the majority of their work, they lie about offshoring the majority of their work, they lie to their employees about pay, hours, and job status and breach contracts left and right.

TransHealth -->  I have nothing bad to say about them.  Pay always on time, people nice (they have since been bought by Webmedx).

Precyse Solutions -->  Nothing horrible to report.  If I recall, they didn't pay for templates, but they told you that up front.

Medquist --> horrible people in supervisory positions, very cliquish company, bad dictators on all my accounts!

Webmedx -->  The account I was on was completely and utterly horrible!  Other than that, nice people, very organized.

Accutype --> complete embecil in charge (when I worked for them) who knew nothing about transcription or the needs of MT, again very cliquey with friends giving friends the best work.

Diskriter --> ran out of work frequently

I also worked for several small MTSOs that were either bought or went out of business, and I will say it usually was the smallest MTSO that I enjoyed working for the most.  I did work as an IC for a company out of Arizona doing radiology a few years ago for a while (I can't remember the name, but I don't think they are around anymore).  Also I worked as an IC for Administrative Advantage out of Pennsylvania were pretty decent, easy accounts and easy to make money, used DropChute to deliver dictation and reports back and forth and you just typed in one big docment per dictator in Word.  Simple, straight forward, and always on time.  If you ran out of work, they would try to put you somewhere else, but never made any promises.  I like honesty and they were honest.

See how easy that was.  You try!

I have never heard professionable before.  lol

But they had an ad on the big MT job board.  They're in Florida.

you get paid when we get paid by the client, pay 0.07 to 0.8 cpl, you must submit your own invoices, a 2-dollar charge for direct deposits...I quit reading after that. 

I don't work there but thatis what their web site says. 

http://www.nicholastranscription.com