I think most here would agree that going to the suits with any of our (sm)

• Suggestion - MTSO
  • You, MTSO, should just stop coming to OUR board if you're (NM) - so sensitive
    • Oh, goodness. We WANT MTSOs and others to - come here -- sm
  • I think most here would agree that going to the suits with any of our (sm) - Achin' Belly
  • bellyaching - jellybelly
  • LOL. not. - IC
  • Mom, is that you? - sirpercy
  • methinks someone is fishing - Emperor of Tunisa
    • Familiar - fishing with attituse
      • Right on! Too bad more supes and owners don't - (sm) - Achin' Belly
      • Good reference here - CMT
    • Dear Emperor - good post - NM - sirpercy

The messages you are viewing are archived/old.
To view latest messages and participate in discussions, select the boards given in left menu

What someone said on another thread got me to wondering about the salaries of those at the top.  I googled the head of Transcend and came up with this on a Forbes article.   Not too shabby.  This was for 2007. 

I agree also.  I do think that each company has its MTs that have not one thing good to say about the company and on the flip side, there are many that love it.  I have worked at a few different companies in my time and find through experience on this forum to be true.  I absolutely love Transcend.  There are a few things that aren't perfect in my book, but the good far outweighs the bad.  The thing that I hate, though, is if you have anything good at all to say about your company, you are either management, lying, or a cheerleader.  I think that people love to believe the worst. 

I also have found out through my travels that things can vary greatly from one employee to another even though they may work at the same company.  There may be a rule for you that does not apply to another, example - below one says Spheris would not allow someone to work at MQ also but there is an MT who is doing it with permission.  An MT can get on here and argue all day long that this or that doesn't happen at their company but it may very well happen for another MT.  It is so humerous to me to see that we believe that being employed at a company, in our remote homes, that we think we know everything about that company and how it operates with the other remote MTs - MTs that more than likely we don't even know. 

When offshore outsourcing first began many clients began jumping on that bandwagon thinking they were going to be able to save money.  That resulted in a great number of clinics and hospitals eliminating their in-house transcription departments because of 1) reduction in overhead expense by outsourcing a whole department and 2) realizing an even greater reduction in expenses by using foreign labor at less cost than domestic transcription wages.  The trend is beginning to come full circle now and because of quality issues and the higher cost of risk management more clients are demanding that their medical records information stay in the United States.  A lot of MTSOs now advertising are stating right in their ads NO OFFSHORE MTs NEED APPLY.  Clients are beginning to see that it wasn't as cost effective as they thought it would be because it actually ends up costing more in the long run either in quality or risk management. Some hospitals and clinics are actually bringing work back in house again and only using domestic vendors for overflow work.  I think sooner or later unless the quality of VR improves it will have the same result. 

Thank you for posting this!  I am also very happy with Amphion.  It is nice to hear a positive experience for a change.  I hope your post will help other MTs searching for work realize that there really are some good companies out there!

Definately the meanest on this board.  Always has something to say, whether it pertains or not...