I removed it; please do not discuss other websites here. (NM)
Posted By: Goldbird (Moderator) on 2006-02-27
In Reply to: company listing - txmt
Goldbird
Complete Discussion Below:  marks the location of current message within thread
- company listing - txmt
- I removed it; please do not discuss other websites here. (NM) - Goldbird (Moderator)
The messages you are viewing
are archived/old.
To view latest messages and participate in discussions, select
the boards given in left menu
Other related messages found in our database
If 10 people vote to have post removed it is removed
automatically. Look near the bottom of this post and click on the blue vote/moderate and go from there. I've already voted, so need 9 more. This person does need to be banned though and as they represent themselves as being SS management, then SS should also be banned.
Have you been to their websites? Here's one of them.
For the less famous companies, sometimes the best I can do is to study their websites and then e-mail a resume to see who wants to talk. Then I ask my questions.
http://www.inhealthtranscription.com/demo.htm
How many Websites have you visited?
I have looked at a large number of them and not only do many not give platform info almost none give pay scales and space/header/etc info
Company websites list requirements, etc
.
Me too -- foreign websites galore that i found
x
Keeps track of keystrokes and websites. Monitors you to make
s
That would be something you would have to discuss with them.
I am not sure if all are done the same way and do not want to give out incorrect info.
Did you discuss this at all with them,
especially if you had no way of knowing client specifics and could not get them on your own?? If they were available to you, that might be a different story however.
If you would like to email me, we can discuss more.
.
Discuss MQ on the MQ board, please. (NM)
Goldbird
Well, so then why do you care if we discuss it again?
?
Why are we allowed to discuss MQ's
pending lawsuits but not KS's? 
We can't discuss it on MT Stars
NM
We can discuss whose behavior is sad
And if you aren't familiar with the word Hades, which gets through the word censors when it's other more common alliteration does not, then perhaps you should read more rather than spend your time on the board star gazing.
We aren't supposed to discuss our pay,
without my name here, please don't email me, I make 9 cents a line inpatient trancsription.
you just don't discuss pay. Ranges maybe, but not actual pay (sm)
As with every company that I know of, there are big ranges in pay, and it just should not be discussed on a public forum, or actually even with people you know. Not everyone may be offered the same thing and it causes too many problems. Any professional person would know this, no matter what field you are in.
I'd talk to the Nat'l first and discuss what would make that a better job sm
for you. I always try to make things better before making a decision.
The board fills up when MTs try to discuss TT because
management & a couple of cheerleaders, but mostly management I believe, literally freak on every single post rather than just letting the MTs have a discussion. If I owned TT, I would request those few stop acting like that & let the MTs have their own honest discussions on this public board without interference. It's so silly.
Why not just bring up another topic to discuss sm
and let them bicker amongst themelves in the their own threads? Seems a whole lot easier just to start a totally new thread. No one is obligated to read their posts.
That is just silly. People discuss pay all the time.
x
Posts below don't discuss platform specifics...nm
did you read them?
Still hoping for some information on platform from someone who works there. Thanks.
Yes, you can discuss anything UNTIL it rises to the level of libel.
Do you have any idea the damage some of these vicious and unfounded rumors and innuendos can cause a company? Do you really want to place yourself at that kind of jeopardy? Why should a company sit back and take it? Stating an opinion is one thing, but stating something as a fact when you truly have no idea what you're talking about is another thing. Gimme a break!
I never ever discuss pay of any kind, just not a good idea
because what one person gets paid may not be the same as another and it can cause hurt feelings and problems. I will tell you that the downtime pay is the same as vacation pay - LOL.
Probably getting together to discuss line rate cuts. nm
x
People discuss line rates, yes, but pay, I still say is not professional
nm
please feel free to submit your resume and we can discuss all of the above/below :)
xx
Go to their Indian website or other Indian websites
xx
Ad has been removed. Thank you.
/
Why where they removed? nm
Their ad has been removed.
//
The CLK job has been removed as we do not allow
job posts advertising pay of less than .05 cpl. Even for a new MT, anything less than .05 cpl is entirely too low even as a learning wage. We welcomed the company to repost offering .05 cpl as a learning wage of pay.
Removed. NM
Goldbird
It's been removed. Thanks!!!!! nm
/
No, it isn't. It's been removed. ---nm
I would like to know why it was removed also. nm
nm
These have been removed.
You can always email one of the moderators with the URL for something like this.
Moderator
It has been removed. nm
xx
I removed the job ad. SM
I don't believe it is legitimate for several reasons including the fact it mentions benefits for ICs (ICs do not receive insurance benefits or any benefits) and they ask for money up front for background checks. You should not have to pay to interview or work for any company advertising here.
Moderator
It was removed by the moderator almost as
nm
Looks like administrator removed the ad
...
That's because most of the posts were removed
.
Since the post was removed,
nm
I think those posts were removed
and the MQ board has a post from Goldbird stating that there is no proof of such.
If it is true, it wouldn't be the first time. Secondly, it wouldn't be much of a surprise since it's been all over the business news that Philips (the majority stockholder) announced it wants to sell.
As a current employee of MQ, I certainly don't think things can get much worse at MQ, so maybe a new owner would be a good thing. Fortunately, I have a backup plan and can just sit back and watch this one play out. 
No. Message has been removed. nm
Names were removed. (sm)
We try to edit if at all possible.
Moderator
No, it's not. A thread was removed.
As is alluded to here; however, the context is missing. That is why the person is asking for a private e-mail.
The thread that was removed had nothing to do with
Landmark, it had to do with someone complaining about people complaining on this board.
The posts were removed because names were used. That cannot
be done. KS is just the target right now.
Two posts removed -- same poster. (SM)
Two replies have been removed. One was by BDTD and it was followed up by KS Team Leader. They are one in the same.
Deleted for inappropriate content and continual violation of posting policies.
All the negative posts were removed.
I would have to assume it is because Davis supports mtstars although Davis has never advertised for employment here. They use the 'other' MT job site.
Pay has never been on a timely schedule and comes late no matter what is said differently. There have been many instances of bounced checks. Because of that and problems being able to have work every day, I left there. The pay scale was just re-vamped so I don't know what kind of money can be made. That'll have to be answered by someone else. Maybe with the new payscale payment will be able to be made on a regular, timely schedule.
Things are always changing so who knows? Maybe it would be a good fit. Good luck.
Reply removed -- please see message.
Please do not post other websites on MTStars.
Thank you,
Goldbird
|
