I dated a stutterer once...

Posted By: SAM on 2009-04-03
In Reply to: Are you totally stupid or what? - Offendedmomof stutteringchild

He was the P.M. supervisor of operations at the hospital I worked for.

I found it rather sweet when he'd get excited about something and start to stutter. It never bothered me in the least, and I certainly never used it as a barometer for his intelligence.

We all have our quirks. Some people stutter, some people bite their nails, some people twirl their hair. I kind of file them all under idiosyncracies, because we have have SOMETHING that makes us unique.

Hang in there, offendedmom, your son will be A-OK.

Complete Discussion Below:

marks the location of current message within thread

Stuttering dictators - Going Crazy
- Are you totally stupid or what? - Offendedmomof stutteringchild
  - She said she had difficult report by a stuttering ESL. Not derogatry. Get over it. - nm
  - I voted to have your post removed - sm - MT
  - I dated a stutterer once... - SAM
  - Hubby has stuttered his way to a 6-figure engineering job...nm - Hang in there, mom.
    - Do you work as a hobby? nm - nm
  - please don't make assumptions - sa
  - OP is making fun of a person's speech? nm - I agree with YOU!
  - You seem a bit hostile. SM - observer
    - Nurse practitioner? - That makes no sense
    - Absolutely I am being hostile - offendedmomofstutteringchild
      - I was not offended by the comment - Have a Stuttering Child, Too
- When I worked at TransTech, there was a doctor on one of the accounts sm - LTMT
  - I had a dictator like that once. (sm) - Marmann
    - Me, too sm - Jadie
      - That's a beautiful story! (sm) - Marmann
        thanks for sharing - offendedmomofstutteringchild
        Thank you. (sm) - Marmann
        Now I'm offended at your post, where you imply that - janitors are the opposite spectrum of
        janitor remark - offendedmomofstutteringchild
        I actually have always hated to be called a typist. I do not just copy type. sm - LTMT
        Re; Politically correct terms - fatcat
        He was all that and more (sm) - Jadie
        Very small world indeed! (sm) - Marmann
  - how about an ESL doc with a stutter? - sa
    - I used to do an ESL doctor that stuttered and sometimes it was really interesting - - anon
    - I do an ESL who stutters sm - He is just FINE
      - would never even think of refusing to - sa
    - Now THAT'S s-s-s-sc-sc-scary! - Eeek!

The messages you are viewing are archived/old.
To view latest messages and participate in discussions, select the boards given in left menu

Other related messages found in our database

Dated 12/19/05 nm
nm

go to page 4 in here dated 05/17/07
@@

Email was from the president/CEO, dated 6/19. nm

Ad on MTjobs dated 06/23/2008. nm
.

I have a check from an MT Company that is dated 2/16. I have not been able to-sm
cash it because when I call the bank the funds are not available. What recourse do I have?? I really could use the money. I know I can't get blood out of a turnip though so I realize I may be out this $$. Someone told me if I deposit the check and it bounces I can report her to the DA for a bad check. Is there anything I can do just knowing it is no good???? Thanks.

original post was dated 8/12 --sm
and is stuck between *has Spheris moved* and WMX post. It had 90 something views.

When I searched, the only replies were dated 2004
NM

Their ad is still there, dated 7/12. Probably bombarded with 100s of resumes and hired the
s

Their web site is dated 2002. I never got an email reply when I sent one within
s

And DRC has a fresh ad out for hiring dated yesterday. Hmmm...nm
s

Wonder if they folded or got sold. Their webpage is dated 2002! nm
s

interesting, it's back on board dated today
/

Their last job opening on the other board isn't dated. They were using Vianeta &Arrendale? soft
s

If you click on it, it takes you right back to their dated website, too. Maybe the banner is old?? n
s

On the MTIA website, those entries are dated July/August 2006! Now, in 2008, if you write your...

congressman in support S. 810 or H.R. 1653, you are supporting an act governing federal grants for scientific research or abstinence teaching in federally funded sex education programs,

And, I'm not saying I don't support those two issues. I'm just saying it has nothing to do with outsourcing. In order of effect real change, we must at least sound like we know what we are talking about. Writing our congressman in support of a two year old bill that no longer exists or writing out congressman about outsourcing and reference bills that have nothing to do with outsourcing, makes us all look like uninformed weiners!