EmmaMT
Posted By: fatcat on 2008-12-30
In Reply to: Industry standards - EmmaMT
ADHI has never advocated for MTs. It is more like a Ponzi scheme to enrich its officers with dues and threats of licensure. I know many fine MTs who make well over 50K a year and have nothing to do with ADHI. So I am with you, who needs them?
Complete Discussion Below:  marks the location of current message within thread
The messages you are viewing
are archived/old.
To view latest messages and participate in discussions, select
the boards given in left menu
Other related messages found in our database
EmmaMT
ADHI has never advocated for MTs. It is more like a Ponzi scheme to enrich its officers with dues and threats of licensure. I know many fine MTs who make well over 50K a year and have nothing to do with ADHI. So I am with you, who needs them?
I agree with you EmmaMT...
Storing the records and reports electronically doesn't mean we don't have to transcribe them, just means they are stored in a program, rather than on shelves or boxes...so it may do away with file techs but not transcriptionists...as for voice recognition, I don't know about you guys but most of my doctors I type for can't even pronounce regular English words corretly, let alone medications, et cetera...so we are a long way off from any perfection with voice recognition...
What's wrong with Georgie's posts? Seems EmmaMT was
x
|
