Can't play the game unless you have the equipment.

• Boycotting the AAMT BOS - Sick Of It All MT
  • BOS is BS when we remove the O, right? - nana
    • You said it even better than I did and - Sick Of It All MT
  • Couldn't have said it better myself - wonderingMT
  • If your employer requires you follow BOS2, then you would have to - kay
  • Ah, you're probably the one who completely ignores my.... - JMO
    • Everything is left up to interpretation as well. - I can tell you right now.
  • Crohn diease - The disease that was name after Burrill Crohn. sm - JAN
    • that would make it the disease of B. Crohn, therefore, the apostrophe stays. (sm) - SP
      • Since the apostrophy shows possession, doesn't ... - seems to me
    • It is also Graves disease, named after Robert J. Graves. - Not Grave's
      • We also say 'Ford trucks' named after Henry Ford. Makes sense to me. - sm
  • The book contains suggestions. They don't write the rules - sm
  • Boycott the BOS? Why not boycott the companies who offshore? Makes more sense to me. - MSMT
  • I think the BOS is the least of our problems now, unless they - are publishing it in Hindi. nm
    • LOL! Thanks, I needed that. - nm
  • AHDI - slapping pooperectomy
    • I just love - Wendy
  • AAMT standardization, not picky - HospitalHomeWorker
    • Well said from a pro! nm - nm
    • AAMT BOS - TO FLIBBERTYGIBIT
    • Right on! - QArbouncin
    • Oops, that "transcriptionists" - HospitalHomeWorker
    • EXCELLENT POST! - Well said! Thank you!
  • the company I work for has always ignored the BOS. sm - let me vent
    • Who needs it? We don't. Just don't buy anymore with their silly rule changing. - nm
  • Boycott? - QArbouncin
  • Can't play the game unless you have the equipment. - suggestion
  • But I've been ignoring it for years - LOL - Not telling where I work
    • I've never used it - LinK

The messages you are viewing are archived/old.
To view latest messages and participate in discussions, select the boards given in left menu

So, if I happen to be a favorite where I work because I am a high producer, I should not benefit from that?  I should not benefit from that because another MT who is not a high producer does not get the same treatment as me?  So, you are saying that it's unfair treatment to that MT.  Well, I think it's unfair treatment of high producers!  We are the ones that produced those lines.  No one came and helped us type.  We are the ones that sacrificed our personal time to put more into our job.  We are the ones that sat up late at night while others were getting a good night's rest.  We are more often than not the ones that work the overtime and help out on many, many accounts at a moments notice, practially being on call.  So, I think that you get what you deserve.  If you give normal, average, you get normal, average. 

I am tired of being treated unfairly because I work longer/harder than some and reap some benefit from that.  I deserve it.  If you want it, put forth the same effort.  We all have the chance to become high producers or favorites at our companies.  It is just a matter of personal choice if you want to be one or  not.

pay.  There is at least 1 person below who is upset because he/she doesn't get the same rate the OP gets.  Question--did you just accept the line rate offered or did you attempt to negotiate it?  More often than not, the MT is offered a line rate and just says okay and it doesn't have to be that way.

If you have years of experience with 98% quality or better, high-level acute care work (not just rural hospital gallbladder/appendix type stuff) and are willing to work the off shifts you can hold up each of those items and all of them as a whole to leverage yourself into a higher per-line rate right from the start.

It may only be that the MT next to you is making more per line because they did a better job of negotiating the rate.

I would stay away unless you want to work your fingers to the bone, be monitored on how many minutes you clock in, and appreciate little or no respect for the work you do.

What we have always seen happen within the U.S. between U.S. workers in the job market , competition , is expanding to the global marketplace. U.S. workers now not only have to compete with each other in the arena of  marketable skills , they must also compete with those in other countries who not only possess the same marketable skills , but do so at lower prices. Naturally , a company which can get the same production out of a worker for a smaller price is going to choose that worker, as the savings in labor costs will increase the bottom line.We lost our manufacturing base on just this scenario...a fatal blow to the soundness of our economy , IMO. That left us with a service sector base , which is also facing the same threat , with the likelihood of the same result , suffered by our manufacturing base.

One solution is as Obama has suggested. The feds take away any tax breaks companies which outsource get to the deteriment of U.S. workers. Will the U.S. government do something like that? I doubt it. Look at what is happening right now over the issue of illegal immigration into the U.S. We were attacked on 9/11 ; drugs and criminal are being brought across our borders ; our law enforcement officials and citizens are under attack ON OUR OWN SOIL from those coming across the border ; and in the economic arena , companies are hiring illegals and undercutting U.S. workers' wages.

The People have demanded the border be secured and the Congress passed a bill calling for U.S. border security. But , what has actually been done? NOTHING!!! Why? Because the feds don't want to secure the borders. If they did , the borders would be secured , or at least a serious attempt would have been made. So , why haven't they secured the border? Because U.S. companies want to employ illegals and pay them lower wages , thus increasing company profits. The dirty little secret , that isn't really a secret , is that our legislators and president are all about serving their masters...and that isn't We the People ; that is the corporate and banking classes who fund their campaigns and give them lucrative positions in their compamies when they leave office.

So , unfortunately there it is.

Same old ads, same old resumes.  Nothing is going to change, people.  We are stuck with each other. 

Happy Labor Day.  Or should I say Groundhog Day?  If you catch my drift.....

with each report we type.  If that doesn't justify a decent compensation, I don't know what will. 

Should we just hop to the problem parts of the report since we are only getting paid for that part of the report, eschewing the rest, not making sure it makes sense?  It's outrageous, and we should all refuse to do it unless we get paid the same as straight typing.  Why should technological advances cause us to lose pay?  No one else is taking a cut except us, yet we are the glue that holds this profession together.  I know it's all been said before, but it's wrong, and if the MTSOs read this board, they will at least know where we stand on it. 

We earned our knowledge through blood, sweat and tears over the years, and we should be compensated for it.  Why shouldn't we?!

You have to lie a lot, wouldn't you agree?  It is all bait and switch for the recruiters.  They promise a lot, but the companies do not follow through.  Care to say who it is you are a hiring manager for?  LOL.  Never heard it called that before.

Those medical records became cheaper for hospitals how?  When they go to court with those expensive incorrect records and LOSE, wonder if they think it was cheaper?

Don't have to have the last word to have the last laugh, and I'm having a good one.

Such an easy mark. . . such a short fuse.  WOO!  I am laughing out loud.